There
were two opposite streams of philosophy before Kant. One was rationalism,
propounded by Descartes and Leibniz, which considered reason to be the only
source of knowledge. The other was empiricism, propounded by Hume and Locke,
which considered experience to be the only source of knowledge. But, Kant found
faults in both of them. He reached a ‘synthesis’, i.e., criticism, by analyzing
the thesis, i.e., rationalism, and the antithesis, i.e., empiricism. According
to him, knowledge is neither wholly a priori, as rationalism maintains, nor
wholly ‘a posterior’, as empiricism maintains, but it consists of both a priori
and a posteriori factors. Kant distinguished between the matter and forms of
knowledge – the matter or material knowledge is supplied by experience; the
forms of knowledge are supplied by reason. According to Kant, sensation is
created from experience. If this sensation is well arranged with reason, then
the knowledge is attained. Thus, Kant’s ‘criticism’ or critical theory is a
great contribution to epistemology.
Comments
Post a Comment