George Gordon Lord Byron (1795-1821), in spite of his being a romantic poet, was very much different from other romantic poets in respect of the characteristics of his poetry. Most of them had escaped from the social concerns, i.e. from objectivity into the world of nature and of imagination as well as into subjectivity. But, in Byron, we see an important combination of subjectivity and objectivity, i.e. of personal and social. Unlike others, he was very much satirical to the social faults. From this tendency, Byron wrote his famous ‘mock-epic’, Don Juan, exposing and satirizing hypocrisy and the corruption of high class society, criticizing the poetic tendency of the time. However, to make it effective
he used wit humor, irony, exaggeration etc.
The Narrator of Don Juan
At the very first, a question should be resolved. Are the narrator and Byron same person?” – No.
Rather, Byron makes his narrator to be conservative and sometimes unreliable
and extra sympathetic to the male and a representative of that society. The
conservative narrator suggests Juan’s parents that they would have whipped him
“to teach him manners for the time to come.” As unreliable, at the very first
tells that he will not digress as a narrator, but later he again and again
talks of himself, his liking disliking etc.
Heroism in Don Juan
At the opening of the poem, Byron satirizes the traditional epic
heroes and heroism; then suggests
his own hero; at last reconstructs the heroes. He does not want a traditional
hero of strong personality, working for common interests. But he says – “I want
a hero, an uncommon want” who later proves a ‘mischief-making monkey’ and busy
with his personal and illegal love-affair. Actually, his purpose is to expose
the hypocrisy and corruption of the high class society through his hero.
Moreover, Juan’s heroism is shown at the scene of ‘duet between Alfonso and Juan
where Juan flies away leaving his only garment. Is it an act of any epic hero?
In addition he is compared with Joseph in order to underestimate him.
Treatment of man and woman
The narrator mentions Seville, Juan’s birth-place, as a pleasant
city, ‘famous for oranges and women.’ Here, purchasable oranges are compared to
unpurchasable women. So, what is the effect? The effect, it suggests, is that
women would play a vital role in the poem as available as oranges.
We should make it clear how Byron has
treated men and women, especially women in his poem. Actually we will see the
male characters, Don Juan, Don Jose and Don Alfonso are passive in the poem –
Don in all the three names means Lord, suggestive of their upper class
derivation. On the other hand, the female characters, Donna Inez, Donna Julia
and Antonia, Julia’s maid servant – also here Donna, i.e. Lady, suggesting
their upper class births – all are very active over the male. So the narrator’s
purpose is to impose all the responsibility
of the story upon the shoulders of the female. But, Byron’s main purpose is
double gain – first, to show them as the prey of society, that is, to satirize the society; and second, to
give ironical hint to them.
Satire in Don Juan
There is a satire with
explicit irony on Juan’s education governed by his mother – as his father died
earlier. He is taught at home by special tutors with selected and expurgated
texts directed and censored by his mother, so that he becomes “strictly moral”;
and sexuality keeps out of his reach and knowledge. But the irony is, though Juan remains
permanently boyish and innocent in sexuality, his latter life is dominated by
sexual love, by proving his all education fruitless. So, what is the reason?
The reason is the circumstances and fault of education in contemporary upper
class society. The more he is hid from sexuality which is an inherit thing, the
more he becomes curious and later turns vicious; because curiosity is very
dangerous. Another critical reason becomes clear in stanza 52 where the narrator
is very ironical towards Inez, a female guardian, and here he suggests, if he
had a boy, he would have sent him to college. So the indication is that under a
single parent of an unhappy couple, especially under a mother, the education of
a child can not be fruitful.
Byron satirizes the education and marriage of the female through Donna Inez; by using a
term, exaggeration. Byron exaggerates Inez by portraying her as “a learned
lady, famed for every science known in every Christian language ever named,”
her memory as ‘mine’. Is it believable for a woman at that time? This
exaggeration reaches anti-climax when the narrator says –
“In short in all things she was fairly
what I call
A
prodigy. Her morning dress was dimity.”
Here mentioning both discussions of serious intellectuality and
insignificant dress together creates humor. That is, Inez’s education was an
irony for the contemporary society. Irony towards Inez becomes satire to the
whole society when the narrator says –
“Tis pity learned virgins ever wed
With persons of no sort of education,
Or gentlemen, who, though well-born and
bred,
Grow tired of scientific conversation.”
But the questions lies elsewhere – were the women at the time free to
learn all and to choose their life partner? So this is the satire by Byron.
Byron’s satire is on another marriage- marriage between Julia, an
extra-ordinarily beautiful lady of 23, and Alfonso, almost an old man of 50.
Byron describes the marriage and comments on it –
Wedded she was some years and to a man of
fifty,
And such husbands are in plenty.
And yet I think instead of such a one
‘Twere better to have two of five and twenty.
This sort of odd marriage containing age distinction is in plenty in
the patriarchal society. Because being older the man can easily make the woman
rely upon him and prey to him. But after a ‘cold relationship’ between them
what is the result? The result is the lady’s extramarital relationship with
other people. But if the husband and wife were of same age, this kind of
scandal would not happen. So, is Julia as well as the ladies of that society
guilty?
Eventually there grows an extramarital physical relationship
between Juan and Julia. But, Byron is very much critical and ironical towards
Julia.
“That Donna Julia knew the reason why,
But as for Juan, he had no more notion
Than he who never saw the sea of ocean.”
That is, the narrator wants to say that having already been married
and being older than Juan, Julia knows all about their passion and attraction
to each other. On contrary, this kind of experience is totally unknown to Juan.
So all the responsibility of this illicit relationship is for the woman, Julia
– to speak clearly all the malpractice happens for the women in the society.
Byron satirizes the society’s double-standard of punishment for the
illegitimate relationship. Juan is sent to the European countries for moral
purpose. But actually he is rewarded to travel. On the other hand, Julia is
sent into a nunnery. But actually she is punished by sending into prison. So, the
society’s treatment of male and female is clear here.
At last, the narrator very simply
expresses a letter sent by Julia
from nunnery to Juan. But this letter establishes Julia to be a different sort
of character who casts our sympathy,
as happens for the case of the Duchess in “My Last Duchess”. She writes to Juan
–
“They tell me ‘tis decided; you depart.
‘Tis wise, ‘tis well, but not the less a
pain.
I have no further claim on your young heart;
Mine was victim and would be again.
My eyeballs burn and throb, but have no
tears”
That is, Julia is the victim of the society and again will be; ‘but have no tears’
suggests that she is able to bear her punishment – though she neither accepts
nor protests the punishment. Moreover after having lost all of her, she does
not regret for what misfortunes she has faced. So, all of this shows her
quality of a tragic character –
though the narrator treats her negatively – while Juan as a passive character.
Byron uses Don Juan, his hero, as a medium
to satirize contemporary poetic trend,
especially Wordsworth and Coleridge. Juan goes to nature aloof from society in
order to pacify his mental agony with the help of the ‘healing power’ of
nature; and becomes almost a metaphysician; but all in vain. Suddenly Julia’s
picture appears before his eyes and ends his thinking. (st. 90, 91, 92) Moreover
Byron says –
Thou shalt believe in Milton, Dryden, and
Pope
Thou shalt not set up Wordsworth, Coleridge
Southey”
Because the neo – classical poets have social concerns while the
romantic poets escape from social problems.
Byron also attacks on the hypocrisy of the characters – Though
Donna Inez teaches her son, Juan, strict morality, she does allow him to mix
closely with Julia, wife of Alfonso with a view to taking a revenge on Alfonso,
her earlier lover. Donna Julia, though she promises “I will never content” to
Juan, at last she surrenders to Juan as an active partner of sexual
relationship. Even, at her bedroom she violently pretends to be a chaste woman,
when Juan is on the bed.
Byron’s satire is also directed against
the emptiness and carelessness of the
male members of the society. Don Jose is very careless to his wife and goes
where his mind leads, and is a man “with no great love for learning or the
learned.” Alfonso is another man who one night entered his wife’s bedroom “with
more that half the city at his back” in order to discover her illicit
relationship with someone.
Byron also satirizes some social currents. Though Don Jose and
Donna Inez lead “an unhappy sort of life”, they give “no outward sings of
inward strife.” It is a tendency of the upper class. Then, the hearers of the
story of Jose and Inez repeat to others, “some for amusement others for grudges”.
Next, the narrator refers the case of Jose and Inez as a ‘scandal monger’ in
order to improve their relationship!
In fine, from the light of the above
discussion, it has been clear that Byron satirizes the problem of upper class
society. Because of the death of Juan’s father and age-distinct marriage of
Julia, the story is led to extramarital relationship between Juan and Julia,
between the hero and the heroine. So the main theme of the epic is extramarital
relationship. Additionally, his treatment of men and women is of course
mentionable. Next, he creates a Byronic hero who defers from other epic heroes;
he chooses him from the Spanish legend. So under this cover, Byron becomes able
to severely satirize the English society. Moreover, Wordsworth, Coleridge and
other romantic poets have no responsibility for society rather than they escape
from the society.
thanks u so much my dear sir.....
ReplyDeletetnz
ReplyDeleteSir can you plz give me the note down Juan as a stereotype
ReplyDeletea well written analysis
ReplyDelete